Leaderboard

Bit of a headscratcher is this one... I saw the comments on users saying they have appalling framerates, but I never had that? It is heavy on framerate, but really only the same as the usual comparative to say the FF B757/B767, and I have had a few hours on it now. I run xEnviro and WT3 alongside, but a reason might be in the texture settings... I only use "High" and not maximum and my objects down a click, you really lose nothing visually but gain in framerates, X-Plane weather is another factor. To prove my point here are three screenshots... The first is Aerosoft's EDDF with WT3 and Xenviro running and setting up the A320U... I get 26frames (box in corner enlarged) ? EDDF is pretty heavy and complex scenery Second is on approach to ENGM Oslo, again Aerosoft scenery but with some pretty heavy weather around me, I get 28 frames.... At altitude (say FL340) with no scenery it is around 32-35 frames to a top of 40 frames... the numbers don't lie. So are the users being too greedy in what they want? I think so, I never found the aircraft in a marginal framerate position, so nothing worse or nothing better than the rest with the same complexity... SD