Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Yesterday
  2. I love this plane, thanks for a great job SoulMateSim ! I only wished it was enabled for VR control. What would it take to update the cockpit to enable VR ?
  3. Last week
  4. You didn’t really discuss the Freedom Fox livery, but N318JJ is a real airplane, flown by Trent Palmer. Pretty popular YouTube channel, with lots of really interesting, inspiring content.
  5. question.....why does the nose wheel always turn to the right....its not normal and i dont know how to correct it any help thanks Richard
  6. The KitFox menu is up in the X-Plane menu ribbon at the top of the screen near the Developers Menu. Once you select an option it is remembered for future flights.
  7. Earlier
  8. I can click on them and the mouse changes to the hand but, the switch still does not move.
  9. First Quick Impression : Kitfox by Big Tire Productions I do wonder if Big Tire Productions have sort of marginalised themselves with their name, obviously they are going to specialise in tundra, bushy aircraft as there is no way they could do say a Boeing 747 with those tires, but you have to admit it would be interesting. This is their Kitfox, or the Denney Kitfox. Which is a two-seater side-by-side two-seat high-wing kit aircraft, that is designed and originally manufactured by Dan Denney and his company Denney Aerocraft of Boise, Idaho.The aircraft is amateur-built and not type-certified. It is seriously popular with over 4500 kits of the Kitfox having been already delivered in 42 different countries. The KitFox is powered by a very noisy but popular Rotax 912 80 hp (60 kW) engine, which is basically just bolted directly onto a web frame, so the aircraft is noted as an ultra-light or US Super Sport LSA category. Modeling is basic, but extremely well done, remember this is a kit aircraft and a fabric over a frame design. This review is as seen, so the comments noted here reflect this aspect.... ... and the more you look at the design details the more you like it, but don't expect Careando/Just Flight detail and quality, because that is just not here. Note the interesting Junkers flaps and folding wings layout and you have the choice of the original classic wing or a STOL wing with vortex generators. Cockpit is all metal frame with items fastened to it, as expected the instrument panel is very basic, but it does have some interesting avionics... ... the nice laid back seats are very nicely detailed and really well done as is the single pilot who looks stalwartly intense about his flying, he is not animated either. Instrument panel First impression is of a very empty facia with the small set instruments, but this Kitfox comes with a very interesting Garmin G5 3.5” LCD color display electronic flight instrument package that is a basic but still a quite detailed glass cockpit upper Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) and a lower Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI). .... so you have all the functions (not total functionality) of a bigger aircraft's avionic primary flight display, so obviously I am going to love this, but they are small and hard to read. Centre avionics include a GFC-500 dual-axis autopilot, a Garmin GNS 530 (a RealityXP GTN-750 can also be used here) and a Garmin GTX 330 transponder.... far right is a CANaerospace engine monitoring display, and two rows of electrical switches lower left. Both the G5 EFIS and EHSO panels pop up on separate windows that you can move around the screen and great for custom builders. Sound is FMOD 3D, and you get the sounds of a four cylinder/ four stroke liquid/air-cooled engine with horizontally opposed cylinders Rotax 912iS 100HP or the choice to switch to the higher output Rotax 915iS 141HP and both versions sound great internally, but the external is of a very much higher pitch... it may be correct as realistic, but it is a bit uncomfortable on the ears over a long period, but overall the sounds are very good. I love open door cockpits, you get that real exposed flying experience and here both of the flimsy doors open (sounds adjust as well). Note the wing fuel tank gauges set into the end of both of the wings with a 27 Gallons (102.20 lts) capacity. The 912iS will do a top speed of 117 mph (190 km/h), a cruise speed of 110 mph (178 km/h), and the stall speed is 37 mph (60 km/h). Range is a majestic 785 miles (1272 km) with a rate of climb: 1200 fpm (6.1 m/s) makes this all round a pretty impressive little performer. Lighting is of course again basic, with just white background instrument lighting with no adjustment. Externally all the main Navigation and strobes are covered and I really like the LED landing lights Liveries Three liveries are included with the Default (I called it the "Stars & Stripes), Hornet and Sliver + Green are all very good, but a few more would have been great... So this is a great little ultralight/sports aircraft, but I couldn't find a manual (non-provided in the package), or where there was one on the internet? So I couldn't find any menus or the ways that you can change the excellent features or tools (both Tundra and standard wheels are available, but how do you actually change them?).... so in reality the review ground to a halt, and there is still a few buggy, bugs like the heading knob which is the wrong way around (annoyingly).... that is not to say I do not like the aircraft as it is very good and actually really interesting and far than I thought it would be, personally it is slightly overpriced, but you do still get a lot for your money in features and ideas, and the Kitfox is really great aircraft to to fly. Overall my first impressions are that I liked the aircraft far more than I thought I would, it is quite interesting, but as I noted with no manual or information on menus or how to use or change things then this could have been a far more deeper review, but overall Three out of five stars ⭐⭐⭐☀️☀️ Features Included: Choose your landing gear: tricycle, conventional or 29" bushwheels Choose your wing: Classic wing or STOL wing with vortex generators Choose your engine: Rotax 912iS 100HP or Rotax 915iS 141HP Choose your GPS: Garmin 530W or RealityXP GTN-750 Single lever constant speed prop Dual Garmin G5 flight instruments and GFC-500 dual-axis autopilot CANaerospace engine monitoring unit 4K PBR materials FMOD 3D sound Full VR support Now available from the X-Plane.OrgStore ______________________________________________________________________ Yes! the Kitfox by Big Tire Productions is now available from the X-Plane.Org Store here : Big Tire Productions Kitfox Price is US$32.95 Requirements: X-Plane 11 Windows, Mac or Linux 4GB VRAM Minimum - 8GB VRAM Recommended Download Size: 375 MB Current version and Review version: 1.02 (November 1st 2019) Note: In order to use and enjoy VR environment in X-Plane, user hardware and system specs should meet the required specifications for OS, CPU, GPU, MB and RAM which are specified both in the given VR hardware websites and at X-Plane.com. ______________________________________________________________________ News by Stephen Dutton 3rd December 2019 Copyright©2019: X-Plane Reviews (Disclaimer. All images and text in this review are the work and property of X-PlaneReviews, no sharing or copy of the content is allowed without consent from the author as per copyright conditions)
  10. Behind the Screen : November 2019 It is great and even a relief to be back behind the computer after a very demanding house move, actually we moved just 150 meters, but it was a difficult transition. So thanks for all your patience. And then we hit the keys hard in trying to catch up the lost ground, and covering the new releases, and boy what a big month it was in November, and so much going on and even a few mis-steps as well. In another note is that we will again be missing again a few weeks in December also as with the move holding everything up a family situation was put on hold, now we have to travel to sort that out as well, so the dates 3rd Dec to 14th Dec will again mean the site will be quiet, but we will try to fill in everything happening before and after those dates. And a big end of 2019 it is. Obviously the release of X-Plane 11.50 is the BIG one and ditto the Q&A session from Laminar Research on Tues 19th Nov (or 20th Nov here in Australia). A trainwreck dosen't even come close to the session... I watched it live (the broadcast timezone actually for once worked for me) and it wasn't pretty. It was nothing that really Laminar have not done in the past, but this one was more of a group get together at the bar after work sort of affair, a lot of fun for them and not for anyone else... the video was pulled for the obvious reasons. The problem is Laminar are still actually just a very small group of developers, highly talented mind you, but still an extremely small team. So any development and certainly a very extensive change like with the API (Vulkan/Metal) can mean very few resources are available for anything else. Vulkan/Metal has been a total complete year worklog, everything in resources at Laminar has gone into translating these API's, and the benefits are huge like with the 64bit changeover... but the overriding situation now is of course Microsoft's new 2020 version of "Flight Simulator". In most cases Laminar could have just gone on in their own merry way, but the explosion of MS2020 has totally changed all of that, and that is why the Q&A session was such a debacle and why it didn't look good on Laminar Research. Overall they are trapped, as noted everything is focused on those API's but the discussion is showing all the other fatalistic areas of X-Plane that have not been covered, or have been simply left to long on the "Too Hard" development hell list for too long, devotees wanted answers and what they got was hi-jinks and waffle, but overall it just looked like Laminar are simply not prepared for the coming onslaught. Personally I will disagree with that aspect to a point. First no simulator developers have been as forward looking than Laminar, in fact most of the main features being promoted by MS2020 are the very things that X-Plane users have used happily for years, and even years, including flight modeling and dynamic PBR/HDR, but in areas like the ATC and weather Microsoft has had it far better than X-Plane. That is why over the last few years X-Plane has soared with crossover MS devotees in suddenly finding a far better simulator, now most will go back to their favorite home and X-Plane will again feel and look like the hobby outfit they all labelled us all in the first place, there is simply no loyalty in today's market. Most X-Plane leaders including Laminar are noting that "This is really good for X-Plane" but in the way of attracting more gamers or users to simulation, and yes they have a major point there as Microsoft will spend a fortune promoting their new simulator to the world, so yes X-Plane will also get a nice slice of the new action. MS users are of course all wide-eyed and fist pumping the ceiling as all their desperate prayers and that their frantic rose bead rubbing has actually paid off. But their confrontation with the new MS2020 simulator will actually be more confronting than their begrudgingly move was to X-Plane, and probably even more expensive. For one in that only a small part of their huge legacy systems will actually work in MS2020, certainly all the aircraft will not work until they are updated to MS2020 standards, and no doubt the money desperate MS developers want serious payback in delivering the new (if same) products to the users... in time yes a lot of the 3rd party MS machine will move to MS2020, but a lot if not mostly will also be totally discarded if MS want to keep to a more gamer style environment, so if you want that total experimentation and huge add-on experience then actually X-Plane would actually still be for the hard-core users the better versatile option... Hype is also everything. I will note that yes the MS2020 promo's of MS2020 are simply outstanding and yes I am seriously impressed. Calls of "hundreds" of developers are working on MS2020 and millions and millions of dollars are being spent to create it, so you can stop there in believing the truth... the team is realistically about 100 (110 was mentioned) but I would even say it is far less than that (still a huge number against three or four developers at Laminar) and not halve of the Vancouver population as recorded, but the team has had the huge advantage of creating the simulator from scratch (and stealing all the best ideas at the same time). But if you understand simulation that in reality it is one of the most complex multilayered coding than most computer programs, even if the code only runs on one type of operating system. What MS2020 will be out of the box is still covered in hype, yes the few that have access are claiming it is outstanding, but the only test is the one were we make the ultimate choice of use and not the view of a corralled few. I still think it will be subscription based, and again that will still keep many of the one payment and fly for years in X-Plane devotees stay the course, a big percentage of simulation users are also the meanest with their cash. Which brings us back to X-Plane and realistically X-Plane12, due this time next year. Ben Supnic noted that the beta 11.50 will be a long and never ending rollout, well Ben I don't think that can really happen now, in reality Laminar need to have the API beta wrapped up and done by even March, all hands on deck, move the API off the table as it has already has spent out too much time and held the focus at Laminar. I have noted over the last few BtheS about X-Plane's shortcomings, but now the points are now more obvious. Weather, that damn ATC, traffic, water and terrain are all very tired or simply out date by two versions of the simulator.... actually all can be easily fixed. Chris Serio and Tyler Young have been banging away on the ATC for years now, so there has to light at the end of this painful tunnel. Weather needs actually xEnviro? The actual X-Plane cloud formations are not too bad, but need more types of formations... xEnviro's trick is to create the highly realistic weather feel and environments, the conditions created are exceptional, but their heavy 3d cloud system is simply a mess... you can see the idea here, both systems need each other to fix both their weaknesses and to take on the MS2020 system. Realistic water has also been on the cards for years, and shown in demos. Another area to be finally fixed and released and that leaves the outdated terrain textures, certainly the orbital textures need to be seriously updated... and with the loss of alpilotx and no updated mesh for a few years now, and so that is another critical area with a need to be filled. Can all that be done in a year... personally yes I think so, certainly if Laminar bring on board a dedicated person for the terrain and mesh revamp, do that and the the differences between MS2020 and X-Plane12 will actually be quite small with X-plane actually having the advantage of the current large range of current aircraft, plugins and scenery. A lot of the forward movement currently is from Laminar's point of view restricted by the API itself, all or any new features require a lot more better and efficient processing power and the now completed API X-Plane will be finally be able to breath again and run these very heavy processor intensive features, perhaps that was the overall feel at the end of the year Q&A party, but it again came across the wrong way, either way... 2020 is shaking up already to be a huge and very interesting year for simulation, exciting as well. The release of SSG's v2 Boeing 747-8 Inter was one of the most perplexing of the year. I am always totally in full support of any developer, and certainly developers that wear their hearts on their sleeves and are simply trying their very best. But their B748 release in version 2 was simply an odd one all round. Over the years I have had my run ins with a few very inflexible developers, they have a single vision of the way things should be and will give not one knot of space to changing anything, ego is a very big part of this stonewalling inflexibility.. they are always absolutely correct and that is simply the last word on the matter.... the problem with this attitude is that some say 80,000 users see it another way, and a lot if not most of them are quite vocal with that. My job is to warn the victims in the case of the developer before they do a lot of damage to their brand and reputation, most obviously they ignore the comments and usually end up in going to into oblivion anyway, but the greatest developers are the ones that listen, tune in and fix the issues, they go on to usually being the greats and survivors in simulation and SSG have always done this. The original release of the Boeing 747-8 was a very ambitious project from the start and maybe it was a bit too ambitious for a new and fledging developer crew, but they did sort the aircraft out through the numerous updates through the years, the last (legacy) version is not actually that bad overall. But a clean page and a completely new design from the ground up was promised to be all round the things the older version wasn't. The oddness of SSG is that they have been around X-Plane for years now, so they are not an inexperienced crew, and they have been there before. The aircraft however didn't feel like a completely new design from the ground up. It was heavy frameweight wise (I found it to be 4K heavy), visually externally it didn't have the dynamic impact of more current X-Plane large aircraft releases and the most bewildering factor of all was the 3d (virtual) cockpit. All through the original versions of the B748 the virtual cockpit was the most biggest issue. It is an odd place in there, dark, no light dynamics and very dull textures. You got used to it, but it wasn't one of the most nicest of places to do 10 or 12 hours of flying. So everyone wanted a better 3d cockpit... SSG did redevelop that cockpit, but it came out exactly like the old version... you looked around you and it didn't feel or actually look any different in there... very odd. The truly sad thing thing is this factor hides all the really great work done on the systems and features, but again a 3d upper deck and no lower deck was another odd matter as well, and then considering that the doors opened out onto a missing deck? but my thoughts were that with another full 3d deck that would have put the frameweight over 6K, so it was actually a good job it was missing... final note was that all the manipulators touch zones were totally out by miles, so you were operating buttons in areas that didn't have the actual switches or buttons and the new tablet menu wasn't finished or again actually touch zone usable... no doubt SSG will fix up this Boeing 747-8 and they already have released the first v2.1 (or service pack 1) that covers a lot of the issues including the touch zones, but after years of users noting the issues, then why ignore them? And yes it maybe all new, but the aircraft didn't actually feel new, or the more forward modern design we have probably been overindulged with (or expect), and certainly not in it's complex design and weight. Like Apple with their iPhones, every year we just expect more and more from developers, but there has to be a ceiling (no pun intended). But that has also been a constant issue all year really, developers releasing aircraft as a sort of (Early Access) or beta version, in reality it is money grab and selling you an unfinished project disguised as a "enjoy the ride of development" or to beta test the hell out of it, and Colimata's lovely Concorde is a case in point, it has now finally gone to the full release version v1.10. Personally the aircraft was unfinished to fly in it's "early access" incarnation, and problems are getting worse with more and more aircraft now being released unfinished in this fashion, and if I can't fly it, then how are the new users going to be expected to sort it all out. But this sort of business deal can also seriously ruin your brand. If you read BtheS often you will know I have my beefs, mostly I repeat them often and again here I go again... the one overriding annoyance this year and was particularly bad in November is in scenery or there is actually two of them, or first in particular the "Ground Routes" or those ATC route thingys that most scenery developers have absolutely still no idea on how to do them correctly? I have had countless new sceneries this year and last year, and with most they were delivered with very poorly inserted ATC routes in WED. Yes the developers insert the ATC routes, but don't actually a) connect them up to the gates (or even b) label the gates most times) and certainly never ever complete the route flows and AirportOperation files. Yes I know they can be a) hard, b) extremely laborious to do all of these ATC points, but the scenery is crap without these items sorted correctly. A few developers have done a brilliant job with the ATC routes and their work comes alive directly out of the box, but most are downright feeble in traffic action (meaning WT3 and now Global Traffic), and of all the features this one is THE most IMPORTANT.... I hope 2020 is far better in this department, and don't get me even started on poor mismatched brightly coloured photo mesh textures... aggggh! As usual there will be no Behind the Screen December 2019, but the usual 2019 total round up of the year including our best picks of 2019 in the week before Christmas, so look out for the years grand finale post then Bye for now Stephen Stephen Dutton 1st December 2019 Copyright©2019: X-Plane Reviews
  11. Just download my old freeware and you are good to go. Mine was a conversion too, but much more refined, and free. It is also well aligned to any orthophoto. Still valid now. This one seems already old, and not cheap at all.
  12. Sounds like you have a bad file, maybe redownload the aircraft, a note that you have to increase the RPM (on the arm of the collective) before flight..
  13. Well I don't mind if they are this good, I mean how many C172's do we have...
  14. I have a problem with the Huey. I can not switch some switch's also when ever I raise collective the rotor rpm drops so does the turbine and I can not get up and fly.
  15. Much as I appreciate the quality of VFlyte's aircraft, the need for another C150 in an already crowded market escapes me. A Cessna 140A, direct predecessor to the 150 , would have been nice.
  16. Aircraft Review : Cessna 150 Commuter by vFlyteAir As a reviewer your first interaction with a new aircraft can be the moment of setting the feel of what the aircraft is going to be. It help's in knowing where the aircraft has been developed and by whom, a new developer is always the unknown... a known developer and certainly one that you known for a long time is always a treat, or a horror if their past work is either brilliant or average, and average because you know you will have your work cut out for you. Thankfully most long time X-Plane developers are some of the very best in the simulation arena, but that doesn't say you will always like the aircraft. vFlyteAir however are one of the brilliant outfits. Every aircraft is created to a very high standard, but more so that you can do a complete review, fly the aircraft and feel completely at home with no development distractions, just simply flying the aircraft... and that is actually very rare as most aircraft require some or a lot of background work and a though read and dissection of the manual... and that brings us to vFlyteAir's newest release in the Cessna 150. The Cessna 150 is the trainer's, trainer... yes the bigger C172SP is the most standard on the flightline in training aircraft, but I can bet you a monza that your first ever training flight will always be in the tiddler C150... because it is the most perfect first flight training aircraft. This C150 is the "L" version which had the longest production run of any 150 sub-model, being produced 1971–74 of 4519, plus the 485 built by Reims as the F150L. New were the tubular landing gear legs with a 16% greater width (6 feet 6 inches (1.98 m) to 7 feet 7 inches (2.31 m) for better ground handling. The "L" also introduced a longer dorsal strake that reached to the rear window and the empty weight accordingly went up 10 lb (4.5 kg) over the "K". Other changes were for lower seats to provide more headroom for taller pilots. This is not the first high-quality C150 for X-Plane as Just Flight released an extremely good Cessna 152 ll a few years ago, so this C150 vFlyteAir release has a considerable opponent not only to match but also to compete with... so let us take a look at this classic training aircraft. Simulation today has some extremely high standards. At this level the PBR and reflection detail requires almost sublime modeling and texturing. That supreme aspect is in abundance here, the C150 is exceptional in every area and with the high quality detail and realism is factor 101. In fact you have two options... the first one is the "normal" textures which are a bit semi-gloss, or the dried out in the sun look. The other option is for high-spec textures which have more specular or have a glossy shiny finish, the normal is the default shown here. Rivets, panel work, rudder design and working cables are all highly authentic to a real C150. As per all vFlyteAir aircraft this aircraft is modeled on a real version 1972 C150L located in Texas, USA, tail number N17043 (the aircraft is a trainer version). Every detail and moleling aspect presented on this C150 is almost perfection, you simply can't fault the work here, I love all the lighting fittings (LED tail beacon is exceptional)... Glass is outstanding with wear and tear, and you even have corroded areas like in the lower glass or around the frame, reflection and shape is also very, very good. Undercarriage is also really well modeled. You have the choice of Wheel fairing (pants?) or open wheels, and both options look so good it is hard to choose? Gear assembly detail is excellent and worn, and detail is right down to the finest detail of the brake cables and disk brakes. Forward single strut is highly animated in moving components. Internal Detail It's inviting! Both doors open manually from the inside and so do both the large windows... Twin seats are old and tatty, but very authentic to the design. Co-Pilot seat not only moves backwards but folds down as well, but the pilot has not to be visible to work, very nice! Small rear baggage area holds the push-pull handle that you can use to move the aircraft on the ground. Roof lining is a molded one piece grey lining, it is very nice and a modern touch and feel on an old design... .... roof houses a speaker and overhead lights (cabin and red). Whiskey Compass is set high in the windscreen with surrounding movable shades... each side are two air-vents that pop-out internally from the forward part of the high-wing layout, they turn as well as retract, and the right side vent has a built in outside temperature gauge. Instrument Panel For basic trainers these C150 series aircraft are well kitted out in instrumentation, the molded dark facia is lovely here. Side glove compartment is excellent with working torch available inside, with a great instant lighting feature (see lighting). All instruments are clear and concise with perfect reflections, the instrument reflections can't be disabled, but that is not an issue here... ... olde style yokes are lovely, and the red button on the left yoke brings up the X-Plane ATC panel which is a nice touch. Both yokes hide as well, but not individually. Standard Six instruments that are obviously centred correctly in line of sight of the flying pilot with the Airspeed Indicator, Artificial Horizon and the Attitude Indicator on the top row with a clock separating the Artificial Horizon and the Altitude Indicator. Below is the Turn Coordinator, Heading Dial and Vertical Speed Indicator. Two instruments right cover a CDI or Course Deviation Indicator (VOR 1) top and a second CDI indicator lower (VOR 2) (note OBS or Omni Bearing Selector is the knob for adjustment, not the instrument). Lower left panel covers the park brake, lower is the Primer (fuel), start switch and electrical switchgear. Centre panel is the Carb Heat, Elevator trim, Throttle (knob), Mixture (knob) and flaps in five positions of 0º-10º-20º-30º-40º degrees continuous (flap indicator is in the left window support). Lower panel left are the Master power switches and nine fuses (active). Far right panel is a RPM x100 gauge, DATCON hours meter and Suction gauge, with below the two tanks gauges with 26 GAL fuel capacity each, oil Temp/Pressure gauges and far right a Amperes gauge. Lower central panel is an authentic Cessna Navomatic 300A single- axis autopilot... ... unit is beautifully done, but it is a basic device. There are three panel avionic options... in Commuter, Trainer and ADF.... all three options are selected by the tags on the glareshield. Commuter has: KMA 20 audio panel, KX 165A COM/NAV radio (COM/NAV1), KX 165 COM/NAV radio (COM/NAV2), KT 76A transponder, KN 62A DME receiver and the Navomatic 300A single- axis autopilot. The second CDI instrument is connected to the KX 165 (COM/NAV2) ... you could note the Commuter as the IFR version. Trainer has: RT 328T COM/NAV radio and a RT359A transponder, note the lower CDI instrument is blanked off... you could note the Trainer as the VFR version. ADF version will remove the KX 165 COM/NAV radio and the KN 62A DME receiver and install a R-546E ADF unit. This will also replace the second CDI gauge with an ADF pointer. Other panel options include on the fly changable airspeed and altimeter gauge units (knots and mph; hPa and inhg)... .... and AviTab tablet is attached to the left pilot's yoke.... and when you turn the yoke it moves as well, excellent. But two things with the tablet is that it does feel big and close when you have a 73º point of view set so I don't have it visible, and to make sure you hide the tablet (click tab is at the top of the glareshield left) before hiding the yokes, because if not it will suspend in mid-air. A nice Yoke lock is set via pressing the lower CDI instrument, and the hard to see Fuel switch is buried lower under the front of the seats, user metal diagram is beautifully done. Kneeboard/Menu Lower left down by the pilot is an kneeboard that is 3d in action and VR (virtual Reality) ready. There are six pages you can navigate through. First page top has the "Options" listed. You can first add a Co-Pilot and have them either visible internally or not... the pilot will not disappear even with the static elements active of which I like when doing a final parking of the aircraft. "Hide Glass" will take away the transparency, and "Remove Ground Elements" will set the wheel chocks, pitot tube covers and engine inlet cover. The setting is all or nothing (you can also use the internal view externally to hide the static elements). There are engine start options in a custom start or a normal start. The Custom Engine Start feature adds realism to the model by requiring that the pilot follows the Normal Procedures as described in the Pilot Operating Handbook. That includes priming, flooded engine and a load of things to make your day painful, but realistic. Other selections include the Instrument avionic panel options (Trainer/Commuter), Shake effects, Wheel Pants (fairings) and the selection of either a male or female pilot... both renditions are really, really good and finally lifelike... both are also very attractive depending on if you fancy males or females or even both... ... you can switch them to the required flying pilot or Instructor and trainee roles, both pilots are also head animated. There is a significant Weights & Balances chart lower. pilot weight, copilot weight, fuel quantity or luggage weight, the Center of Gravity will all be re-calculated dynamically, and you will see the CG indicator move on the Center of Gravity Moment Envelope chart. X- Plane’s CG datarefs are also updated dynamically. Turning off the Co-Pilot will deduct their weight and above 9 lbs and then 19 lbs a satchel and suitcase will be placed in the rear baggage area. Usually with a lot of luggage weight then a one pilot operation is recommended. Walkaround: Second page is an active walk-around system... This is a fully interactive walk-around in the SimCoders REP mode. Press the aircraft logo and you are transported around the aircraft... ... testing (shaking) flight surfaces and the rudder, checking the oil, and fuel quantities all come with full descriptions as you go around the aircraft anti-clockwise. It is very interactive and I found it easier than the REP version, but not as in-depth. Removing pitot covers and the engine inlet cover can be also be done in the walk-around. Four other pages cover the Checklists of: Before Takeoff, Take Off - Climb - Cruise and Landing... final page is a full performance guide. Aircraft Puller You can manoeuvre the C150 on the ground with the puller. Turn your parking brake off and then go to the front of the aircraft via the internal view (tip: is to set it via a keyboard key input), then select the centre of the front wheel strut to attach the handle... you move the cross on the screen with the mouse and it is so instinctive and easy to do... really love this clever feature. Flying the Cessna 150L When doing a review you have to spend a little time before and in flight learning and checking out the aircraft, and then do a sort of circuit check out flight... but the vFlyteAir in this capacity was really quite different... I didn't actually need to? First I know the C150 from the Just Flight review in the basic layout of the controls, but even discarding that factor, I basically started up the little tiddler up and just simply went flying! Started the C150 up and it idled with a load of conks and chunks like a tired Continental O-200-A air-cooled horizontally-opposed engine, 100 hp (75 kW) engine would do... sounds are of course from a real C150 (tail number D-EIVM, a Cessna 150M model) and recorded professionally in pure FMOD original sound recordings and was engineering by Mike Maarse of SimAcoustics, and brilliant they are.... (open the side window to hear the sounds in their full glory), more so when you open up more of the throttle and the idle turns into a roar. Set the mixture, parkbrake off and a bit of throttle (a fair bit of throttle is actually required to get the aircraft moving, but you know what I mean) and I was gone... Wheee this great! and my friendly Co-Pilot was loving this little tiddler as much as I was as well... ... lovely speed (and friction) reactions to adjustments of the throttle just shows how much advancement X-Plane has now done in the feel and realism of aircraft on the ground. I can not translate how much I love the feel of this aircraft, you feel the weight, you feel the ground friction... .... I set the flaps for takeoff to 10º, but can even set them at 5º if you so desire via the continuous flap movement, pitch trim is centred and after clearance we are ready to go. Throttle up and again the C150L does not jump off the line, it hesitates and then the movement builds up very slowly at first, it feels perfect, so really great... powering down the runway, then turn up the aural sounds, and yes they will give you that "lift of hair" on your neck moment, and at 73 knts you pitch up slightly to take to the air. Climb out is around 670 fpm officially so the 500 fpm is a nice round number without any loss of speed, then choose your time to retract the flaps so you don't get that slight nose pitch. Banking will give you a significant loss of climb, so you have to compensate in the pitch to keep the climb smooth in the turn... In trainers, then aircraft balance and trimming is very important, so to trim up to find the perfect neutral position and the aircraft level (I recommend using a key input)... ... when the aircraft is happy and level then you can turn on that lovely Navomatic 300A single- axis autopilot. It will not go to the set heading bug directly, but you can trim the rudder to keep a straight line by using the outer ring to adjust the rudder trim... if you want the heading bug (HDG/NAV) active then just press the centre knob in, pulling it out will disconnect the heading or to use the turn coordinator (turn the knob)... the only gripe is the autopilot panel does not pop-out, however it is easy to use in this low position. There is no altitude hold or altitude change on this single- axis AP, so changing and holding the altitude is done via the pitch trim which works very well. Glare too bight! Then just select the sunglasses on the glareshield to darken the view... .... I usually hate these sort of gimmicks, but this one is very easy to use and very realistic, okay I love it. Any increase or decrease in speed requires and significant adjustment in the trim, so if you go to almost full power you will be surprised in the change of the angle off attack. If you want be Chuck Yeager and fly fast, then the C150 and all of it's 100hp is not the aircraft for you... 106 knts is as fast as the 150 will go and with a 75% power cruise at 7000ft will give you just a smidge over 100 knts, range is 880 kms at full power (not bad) but you will get 1,166 kms at the cruise setting (brilliant) and the service ceiling is an impressive 12, 650ft Lighting Main instrument panel has set instrument backlighting which is very good and clear to read, there is also an overhead adjustable red panel light of which is very nice... .... cabin "Dome" light is powerful, and I like the lovely phosphoresce Flap indicator and Whiskey Compass at night. External lighting is basic but highly refined... ... single nose landing light is extremely powerful, very good navigation lights (red, green and white tail) and the strobes are both very effective, but the highlight is the LED beacon tail light. A great feature is the torch in the glovebox... open the glovebox and select the torch and it is instantly illuminated.. brilliant. Lowering the power will pitch the nose down without any trim adjustment, ditto for more power and climbing, so you can adjust your descent just by the throttle input, of course there comes the point where the manual yoke control with throttle inputs takes over on the final leg. Controlling the approach speed is easy, I found moving the flaps in 10º increments over a period of time reduced the speed perfectly while keeping the aircraft very stable, jumping say to say 20º or 30º in one movement will of course create a lot of lift and very quickly... so go slow and go smooth. but my way was extremely good as I set the final 40º flap almost at the start of KRSW RWY06 threshold for the final approach speed of 55 knts I felt so in control, and all there was left to do was to reduce the height by reducing the throttle power, too fast a descent, then more throttle, floating, then less throttle... perfect speed and descent control... brilliant. Just a slight flare, less power and you drift down to the runway in perfect control... touchdown is around 48 knts, and stall is 41 knts, but I never felt that steep lift fall off. The point is the full flight was just so instinctive, I required no checking, no looking up tables, no "where is this" and was in complete feel with the C150 from the beginning to the end... I just flew and had a perfect circuit from takeoff to landing, easy... well to a pilot that has experience yes, but to learn on this aircraft is still the best lesson you could do, because it sends all the right messages and feedback for you to fly as the aircraft is to be flown.... I just simply love it, and the lady was pretty well impressed with my flying skills as well, so there maybe a date in this! Liveries Huge choice of one blank and thirteen high quality liveries... Six American registrations, Two UK, one Polish, one Italian, one German, one Brazilian, one all metal and the vFlyteAir branded version. ________________________________ Summary The Cessna 150L is one of the most significant training aircraft in the world, yes there are far more 172SP aircraft, but the C150 Series is still the very best and most popular first flight and training aircraft ever built. This is not the first C150 series aircraft in X-Plane, as that honor goes to Just Flight's C152 ll aircraft and it came in at a very high entry standard. But this is a vFlyteAir design and that changes the game completely. So on every level the aircraft are absolutely top class, but I would put the vFlyteAir ahead with the far better sound, flying characteristics which are exceptional here and even better quality and clever features, the deal maker is simply the price, as the vFlyteAir aircraft is a good whole US$14.00 cheaper than the Just Flight C152, so better for far less sounds like a great deal to me. Out of the box the aircraft is simply sensational and almost totally refined, flying the C150L is sublime experience in that even my review flight was perfect with it not really being a review flight but a totally immersive straight into the flying experience that found me almost speechless... everything is so damn good here, but the excellent sound package and the way this aircraft reacts to your inputs is almost realism perfection. Clever panel layouts cover IFR, Trainer VFR and ADF choices are really well done and can be changed on the fly, as can the Baro and speed from Knts to MPH. Walkraround and aircraft puller features are very good as is the very good Weight's and Balance sheet (real baggage is a nice touch as well), Custom engine start as are the quality animated pilot's that can not only be selected but also change seating position. AviTab and Librain (rain) plugins and STMA updater are all supported, excellent manual and VR kneeboard are also very well covered. So what is not to like... pretty well nothing, but for a few personal preferences. I like the pilot to disappear when the static elements are set, more or show/hide selection in static items than all or nothing and a autopilot/avionics pop-up. vFlyteAir are a legacy X-Plane developer at the absolute top of their game, with quality and highly realistic aircraft set at a extremely good price for absolute value... what more could you ask for, nothing really.... brilliant! ___________________________ The Cessna 150 Commuter by vFlyteAir is NOW available! from the X-Plane.Org Store here : Cessna 150 Commuter Priced at US$28.98 Features Original, authentic Cessna 150 sounds professionally recorded and engineered by Mike Maarse, SimAcoustics Two different panel options - the Trainer panel is perfect for students or those who simply want to fly with basic navigation. The Commuter panel adds DME, ADF and an authentic Cessna 300A autopilot Airspeed indicator can be changed from MPH-over-KTS to KTS-over-MPH Altimeter can be changed from in hg to hPa Optional Custom Engine Start feature - when ON, the Custom Engine Start logic requires the pilot to follow engine start procedures per the POH including throttle lever setting, mixture setting and priming "Save States" preferences - more than 50 different settings, options and preferences are saved each time you fly. Your settings are restored the next time you fly. Dynamic, animated rain effects using the librain plugin (included) Optional shake/vibration effects - engine vibration, engine start, engine shut-down, stalls and touch-down causes airframe to shake and vibrate Interactive pop-out kneeboard with dynamic weight & balance sheet, Options, and Normal Procedures check lists. VR friendly! Guided, interactive pre-flight walk-around Optional wheel pants Tow bar feature - pull your bird out of the hanger using the tow bar! Selectable male or female pilot VR optimized Working circuit breakers Headphones - "plug in" to attenuate in-cockpit sounds STMA Autoupdate plugin included – your copy stays up to date with changes and updates automatically Compatible with X-Plane "Experimental flight model" Integrated support for the AviTab plugin Checklists provided for the XChecklist plugin (available here) Super hi-res textures PBR effects 14 different liveries including a blank white Paint kit available Requirements: X-Plane 11 fully updated Windows, Mac or Linux 4 GB VRAM Minimum. 8 GB+ VRAM Recommended Current and Review Version 1.1 (November 28th 2019) Download Size: 797 MB ______________________________________________________________________ Installation : Download is 797.00mb which is unzipped and is inserted in your General Aviation folder as a 2.62gb folder. Option for higher "high-spec textures" or a shiny aircraft, files are provided. AviTab and Librain plugins are required and a Navigraph account for charts Documentation : includes excellent manual, real Cessna 150L owners manual (but with an annoying "not for real flight" plastered on each page) Alternate_Normal_Textures_README.txt C-150L-1972-OwnersManual_NotForRealFlight.pdf vFlyteAir_Cessna150_User_Manual.pdf ______________________________________________________________________  Review by Stephen Dutton 29th November 2019 Copyright©2019: X-Plane Reviews (Disclaimer. All images and text in this review are the work and property of X-PlaneReviews, no sharing or copy of the content is allowed without consent from the author as per copyright conditions) Review System Specifications: Computer System: Windows - Intel Core i7 6700K CPU 4.00GHz / 64bit - 16 Gb single 1067 Mhz DDR4 2133 - ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 8Gb - Samsung Evo 1Tbgb SSD Software: - Windows 10 - X-Plane 11.40 Addons: Saitek x56 Rhino Pro system Joystick and Throttle : Sound - Bose Soundlink Mini Plugins: Environment Engine by xEnviro v1.12 US$69.90 : WorldTraffic 3.0 Plugin - US$29.95 Scenery or Aircraft KRSW - Southwest Florida International Airport by Aerosoft (X-Plane.OrgStore) US$24.99
  17. Quick Impression : ZBAD - Beijing Daxing International Airport by Star-Atlas CHINA!... this is the first X-Plane payware from China by a Chinese developer Star-Atlas, and it is the brand new and the second largest airport in the world in Beijing Daxing International Airport. Only the MEGA and another new airport ISA - Istanbul Airport in Turkey is bigger. Bigger than Atlanta, bigger than Changi, bigger than Dubai, bigger than Hong Kong, bigger than anything, as we are now in the age of changing the demographics of air transport, the biggest airports before are now the old school system, we are in the new, new mega age. It is satisfying that X-Plane is also (finally) moving away from the US/Europe centric mindset and embracing the rest of the world, but it won't be easy. I have flown to China or Shanghai a few times and mostly in a cargo role of my routes around the world to F1 Grand Prix races, in Shanghai it is the Chinese Grand Prix.. But if I wanted to fly any routes into China there was always a lot of pre-work to get the flight completed, scenery obviously was simply almost non-existent, but I always got the route done. The biggest issue to flying online in China is just simply the lack of data... look at any route map and any area over China and it goes down to single digit waypoints, enough waypoints to get you in or out of the country but not much else, ditto are the arrival and departure waypoints, in most cases they were simply non-existent as well, in all cases I had to create the arrival/departure waypoints for each route right down to the simple Latitude and Longitude coordinates... secondly was the another lack of data for anything representing China in infrastructure, as there are no Open-Street-Maps here so that means no autogen or simply anything to represent towns or cities in the country except for botches on a very flat landscape, sadly it is still mostly the same. So once you cross the Chinese border you are going back to the 1930's in aviation, but that does not mean you should not fly here. It is important to understand this aspect with the review of this scenery. Hopefully more professional scenery will bring the data with them as well, we do have one new tool to use and that is misterx6's SFD Global, if any autogen does pop-up, then you get at least some Asian housing courtesy of SFD Global, but it is rare. But there is a few areas SFD is viewable in this scenery of Daxing Airport. First look and this is a big airport in the absolutely middle of nowhere or lost in the Middle Kingdom, Daxing International Airport is 46 km from Beijing and is a green-field construction and the airport has cost a staggering 13 billion dollars, however being so far away from the city and situated in the countryside, does help the developers here with no autogen. You can see the scenery is surrounded by the maze of boring default textures with nothing to break up the landscape. Intergation here is near impossible. The highlight here is of course that huge sensational starfish shaped main terminal, and it looks very good.... The terminal's design and modeling is first rate, there has certainly a lot of work gone into getting the shapes and the complicated structure just right... ... glass is dynamic and see-through. So the internal areas are visible externally, and the complex design is translated inside as well for your viewing pleasure. Most of the internal areas are not highly detailed, but some shops have low-res textures, but mostly it is empty. The terminal has the world's largest seemless steel roof structure and double deck departure and arrival platforms. The design is clever in that it reduces walk time to each of the five curved spokes, no gate is more than 600 meters from the check-in area. All 79 airbridges are SAM - Scenery Animation Manager plugin (Plugin Required) active and excellent, and all are well modeled to match in with the terminal design... but on arriving I found the VDGS board set too high, and hard to find the stopping point without lowering your viewpoint. The SAM also powers the doors on the huge China Southern maintenance hanger, the biggest maintenance hanger in Asia and it can service 12 A320 aircraft side by side... It is important to understand China's aviation policy of it's airports. They are govened by the "One route, One Airline" policy which means that no two Chinese airlines can base themselves at one airport, so Air China is based at the older Beijing BCIA-Beijing Capitol International Airport (PEK-ZBAA), China Eastern is In Shanghai and China Southern is entrenched at Guangzhou. And for instance when China Southern wanted to do Beijing-Paris services with their A380 aircraft they were refused the route, for international airlines the policy is not valid and so they can fly to all the major airports in China. ZBAD - Duxing is the first airport in Chine to change this outdated policy, as all the major Chinese airlines will now be allowed to operate from the airport, but Air China still has the vast majority stake on slots and aircraft fleet numbers here. Control tower is like a very large football world cup trophy, really well done in the detail and the included internal view is fantastic... .... tower view is set correctly for realism, but you get an obstructed view... best position is to hover just above the tower for no obstructions. Because of the huge layout of Daxing, there are other runway and ramp towers which are scale versions of the main one, some however are hidden behind trees. There are also the airport's infrastructure buildings of which there are many, but they are pretty basic in detail and have flat textures with no real depth of detail... ... the radar however is animated. There is some local Chinese branded vehicles, and animated traffic which are the X-Plane default stock of vehicles. Not a not of clutter and very repeated in positioning, but not bad overall. Clever animated sign needed to be more local in advertising. Beijing Daxing International Airport 北京大兴国际机场 IATA: PKX - ICAO: ZBAD 01L/19R - 3,400m (11,155ft) - Concrete 17L/35R - 3,800m (12,467ft) - Concrete 17R/35L - 3,800m (12,467ft) - Concrete 11L/29R - 3,800m (12,467ft) - Concrete Elevation AMSL98 ft / 30 m ZBAD runway layout is quite unusual, of which there are currently four runways... one more is still under construction, it is an odd layout because two runways in 11L and 17R go over the infrastructure on approach? Runway and taxiway textures are very good with off set ridges, this is all newly laid concrete at Daxing so you can't expect a patchwork of texture styles, in lower light the ridges shine and show depth with the PBR... There is a massive amount of 3d grass and it is all very good, but aligned in sharp rows that make the airfield areas look like cabbage fields? All the other fauna is all very over-saturated, even strikingly so that it all looks almost unrealistic, and there is a lot of that fauna as well... .... blue areas and bright green fencing is to a certain taste? and a lot of the Lo-Res textures are not pretty. Lighting Overall the lighting at Daxing is actually really good and mostly all one tone... but at least there is a lot of it. Approach, runway and taxiway lighting is all good, but the field navigation signs are all buried in the high grass and are unreadable or simply unusable? Terminal lighting is very good, and very well lit and looks realistic. There are a lot of remote static parking areas at Daxing and they are all also well catered for as are the extensive approach roads to the terminal... ... the lighting detail is very good, internally it is really good as well, and very well lit and even realistic. WT3 generation is a waste of time in waiting for WT3 to generate 234 ground routes that don't actually work? Star-Atlas have noted the ground routes are coming soon, but in reality this airport required them at release... Epic Fail. So ZBAD looks like it is still under construction with just a few test flights going on, and not the busy active airport that is required.... Feature list is very good, with a lot of dynamic X-Plane11 features provided including the SAM Plugin. Features HD Ground Texture Animated jetways (SAM needed) Animated Hangar Doors (SAM needed) Vehicles with Chinese characteristic Orthoimage with commercial license Customized vegetation Highly accurate taxiway guidance sign Customized dynamic lighting Animated airport ground traffic Experimental underground structure (Refers to User Manual for further information) Compatible with Gateway & P3D Scenery Detailed terminal includes internal structure Excellent night effect Free updates for XP11 First Impressions Opening up China to X-Plane users and Far East routes is a very welcome addition to the simulator, but these first time Chinese developers have more work on their hands to create a believable Chinese scenario. In X-Plane there is no Chinese data to create any autogen world or routings. So even inserting any scenery into the landscape it is like going back in time and looking at an X-Plane9 landscape. The point of Star-Atlas being a new and a foreign developer to X-Plane is one of the main considerations of purchasing and using this ZBAD-Daxing... yes a lot of the modeling here is very good like with the iconic star-fish terminal and the lighting, and yes they show a lot of future promise, but there are still many areas that are over done or over-saturated, or even under done. Obviously there is always a learning curve, but this is pro-scenery and quality is the order of the day. Highlights are SAM, layout, PBR textures and runways and that excellent terminal with internal detailing. Contrary are the over-saturated fauna, too much grass and hiding important navigation aids, over-saturated flat Lo-Res textures, average modeling and textures for outer buildings and no ATC routes (WT3) is a hanging offence. Two out of Five stars ☀️☀️⭐⭐⭐ ZBAD - Beijing Daxing International Airport by Star-Atlas is now available from the X-Plane.OrgStore here: ZBAD - Beijing Daxing International Airport Price is US$21.80 Requirements are: X-Plane 11.36+ Windows, Mac or Linux 2 GB VRAM Minimum, 4 GB+ Recommended Download Size: 780MB Current and Review Version: 1.0 (23 Nov 2019) Noted is: WT3 will be supported as an upcoming feature Detailed manual with debug information ________________________________________ Quick Impression by Stephen Dutton 26th November 2019 Copyright©2019: X-Plane Reviews (Disclaimer. All images and text in this preview are the work and property of X-PlaneReviews, no sharing or copy of the content is allowed without consent from the author as per copyright conditions)
  18. The VAN's is a nice aircraft, I did a full coverage of the Spectr-Aero SP-30, you might like that aircraft? as it does the Rotax servicing and sounds really well.
  19. I am very happy with this model. I've had several flyinglessons on this aircraft until my medical exam diagnosed diabetes. So now i can cruise again thru the skies😊
  20. I built and fly a Van’s RV-12 with a Rotax 912 ULS and a Dynon Skyview with autopilot. I have just a few small details of possible interest. First, the Rotax is started with choke on and the throttle completely closed. Opening the throttle disables the choke. It is also only rough at idle if you leave the choke on (because the mixture is too rich), and you should never go over 2,400 RPM until the oil reaches 120 F. It is normally a very smooth engine. It does have two carbs and if they are out of balance, you might get a little vibration at idle. Carb balancing is pretty simple to do, though, so even that is not much of a problem. The autopilot is not rudimentary; it offers VS select, altitude pre-select, CWS, and pretty much everything else commonly found in GA autopilots. It’s also very affordable - the Skyview has the autopilot logic built in by default - the only additional cost is two autopilot servos, each costing only $750. That makes what would be a $20,000+ autopilot in any other certificated airplane only $1,500. See YouTube channel RV12Pilot for more.
  21. Okay, I know, you can laugh, I am all android, never touched an ipad. No hard feelings, it works...🤣
  22. I shouldn't laugh, I really shouldn't... but that is actually funny. No you don't press the home keyboard button (X-Plane is not actually connected to the keyboard unless the commands are set) but the home key set out on iPad (the round button on the end of the iPad)... but it is funny 😂
  23. Hello, the ipad seems not working? after turning on it reads "press home to unlock" and turns off. By pressing the home key om my keyboard nothing happens?? Is there a solution? Thanks in advance
  24. First Impression : 'Test-Pilot' Cicaré-8 Project by VSkyLabs This helicopter is another in the series of "Test-Pilot" from VSkyLabs. The VSkylab philosophy is that you purchase an ongoing project, so any aircraft you purchase is not fully completed and is 100%, that is the deal you sign up for to get access to the aircraft, but this Cicaré-8 is certainly a far more a completed aircraft than most of the releases than from VSkyLabs in the past. It is also the third light helicopter from VskyLabs after the Guimbal Cabri G2 Heli and the Mini-500 Project. At first glance you actually think it is the Cabri, with the same scale, same size and even the same in look, but the Cabri had a Fenestron anti-torque shrouded tail rotor and this Argentine helicopter manufacturer's Cicaré-8 however has the standard twin-blade tail rotor on a boom tail. Modeling detail from VSkyLabs is the usual excellent quality, there are a few shortcut straight modeling lines, but overall it is very well done, from the external it all looks quite basic, but under the rear of the cockpit there is a very highly detailed EPA Power R917 Ti horizontal 135 HP engine which is based on the ROTAX 900 Series. The highlights here are the twin animated fans, buried internally, but can be easily seen, they turn on when the coolant temp goes over 85ºc, and turn off again at 84ºc, If you hover over 10 min, you can actually damage the aircraft, then you either have to land or fly to cool the engine. The full internal structure is also highly exposed and very authentic. It is a tight fit in the cockpit for two people (early CH versions were single-seaters). View is excellent and the glass work is really well done... Single central instrument panel is basic, but again well done. A full (Alarm) annunciator lighting panel, with test function that works is top. Instruments left to right are: Vertical Speed, Altimeter, Air Speed, Rotor/Engine %RPM... Dials lower left are Turn Indicator, and L/R Fuel tanks (32 lts each), Dials lower right are Engine Information System, EGT/Temp. Two suspended instruments (both can be hidden) with on the left a Custom VSL AP-1 Auto-Pilot, and to the right a Heading dial. Avionics include a GNS 430 and a Garmin 345 Transponder. Positioned on the top of the panel is a Avitab Tablet (plugin required). Overhead panel is basic with Fuses (non-working), Hobbs meter and lighting switches. Test panel lighting function is very good. Custom Auto-pilot is also very basic, but it can hold your atlitude ALT, change altitude ATT and do Left or Right turns, there is a full section in the manual on how to use the settings. You can have a single or double yoke by selecting the zone in the centre part (join) of the yoke assembly... both yoke handles can be set up in a Y or straight or lower level. Fuel tank switch is between the seats, as is the basic collective. Cabin detail is very good, with some nicely detailed twin-seats Both doors can be manually opened or removed altogether Rotor assemblies are well done, but the main rotor links and animation don't work or move, the tail-rotor yaw movement however does. Sounds: There is a Multi-Layered FMOD sound pack included and it is brilliant, the sounds are very dynamic and highly-realistic, I loved them, and put them together the vibrating SimCoder Headshake plugin and you will feel like you are in the real Cicaré-8, externally they can be a bit cyclic.... but they still bring a smile to your face. The aircraft is full VR (Virtual Reality) ready and VSkyLabs always makes sure the VR experience is first rate. Annoying though is the STMA updater with the version noted, a great tool, but forever popping up on the left screen... I pulled it out of the package for my sanity. Lighting: Lighting is very minimal, internally there is only an overhead light and no instrument back or side lighting, and no adjustment either? Externally there is a beacon, navigation lights and a single blobby landing light? Only one livery is boring, and considering there is some really great livery designs on the real aircraft is also a missed opportunity, there are no menus or extra features, but there is an extensive set of interaction zones for 3d and VR users. Overall these project aircraft don't have a lot of flashy features, the focus is on the flying and not on extensive or changeable features. Sampling the Cicaré-8 Flying these very small and intensively light helicopters can be a very nervy experience. Any heavy movement can easily throw you. But I was at home at the controls of the Cicaré-8 right from the start... yes movements have to be kept to a minimal, but otherwise control was quite easy, movement from a slight foward motion, to a standing hover was easy, and I stayed in the same place without any drift either, yaw left or right and you feel the complete control.... HIGE- Hovering In Ground Effect is very good, but you have to be aware to have the new "Experimental Flight Model" box checked. The transition to forward flight was very smooth with complete control of the collective in keeping of the same height while gaining speed... ... you need a slight yaw to keep the aircraft straight and there are no helpers in here in trim, it is all manual flying, but easy flying as well, I relaxed pretty quickly and enjoyed the machine and the view. In flight I loved it, it is a very casual aircraft to fly and yes a novice could learn the dynamics quite quickly if they understand the basics of vertical flight. Using the custom autopilot is very easy, press the ALT to hold your current altitude and then to go faster or slower then just adjust your collective. LT to turn to go left, and RT to go right, but you will need a few button pushes to get the bank you need, turn off the ALT to transition back to manual control which is pretty seemless. Returning to KHAF - Half Moon Bay the change with the translational lift to the hover was also seemless and also was controlling the forward motion into the hover itself, which is one of the hardest areas of vertical flight as you have no brakes in the air. However the sink-rate felt a bit low, to a point your not sure if the autopilot is actually still active, a bit of fine tuning there. Yes yoke and rudder inputs need to be the absolute minimal for max control, but a nice touchdown was quite easy here. Overall excellent and to get a very non-uneventful first flight from takeoff to touchdown is quite hard without a bit of time and a bit of practise on any chopper, but here in the Cicaré-8 it all felt quite natural. I will note the Cicaré-8 is more nervy with the Experimental Flight Model switched on which is more focused for the pros, turn it off if you are newer to flying helicopters. Features include: VSKYLABS 'Test-Pilot' Project. Highly defined model of the Cicare-8 helicopter. Built around the powerful, native X-Plane 11.40+ 'Experimental Flight Model' environment (must be selected in the General settings window in X-Plane 11). Fully functional VR (Virtual Reality) compatibility. Built-in Avitab compatibility (Avitab plugin not included). Multi-Layer FMOD sound pack. The project is under constant development. Highly responsive VSKYLABS support forums. Now available from the X-Plane.OrgStore or directly from vSkyLabs ______________________________________________________________________ Yes! the VSKYLABS 'Test-Pilot' Cicare-8 Project is now available from the X-Plane.Org Store here : VSKYLABS 'Test-Pilot' Cicare-8 Project Price is US$26.00 Requirements: X-Plane 11 Windows, Mac or Linux 4Gb VRAM Minimum - 8Gb+ VRAM Recommended Current and Review version: 1.0 (November 20th 2019) Note: In order to use and enjoy VR environment in X-Plane, user hardware and system specs should meet the required specifications for OS, CPU, GPU, MB and RAM which are specified both in the given VR hardware websites and at X-Plane.com. Designed by VSKYLABS Support forum for the VSkyLabs Cicare-8 ______________________________________________________________________ News by Stephen Dutton 23rd November 2019 Copyright©2018: X-Plane Reviews (Disclaimer. All images and text in this review are the work and property of X-PlaneReviews, no sharing or copy of the content is allowed without consent from the author as per copyright conditions)
  25. There is actually a difference between an upgrade and an update. Usually it is version change as say from XP10 to XP11 with the XP11 dynamics. This LEBL was originally actually an XP10 scenery, that had a quick adjustment to only work in XP11, so this is an upgrade and not an update... in most cases the developers give a discount to move from one to the other. The sales are coming up soon, so I would take advantage of that to get the discount price of which JustSim scenery usually do a heavy discount.
  26. Hello, I do not agree that you have to pay simply to update-since I already paid to have the previous version and I do not see why dev pay again
  27. Installing this will kill your frames rates by 10-15 frames irrespective of on the ground or in the air at/or above 30,000 feet. Airport Environment HD is completely free and offers similar to identical textures at no fps loss. My system: i7 9700k @ 4.8Ghz nVidea RTX 2060 6GM VRAM 1T SSD 16GB DDR4 RAM at 3200 My normal frames at the densest of airports is about 30 frames. After installing this I went as low as 10fps. ALES LIB and ALES DEV LIB are fine in Custom Scenery folder.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...