AirbusMan

lol thanks for all the great reviews though  

btw: i see that you use xenviro for 95% of your reviews. is it worth getting?

thanks again!

its an exciting time for XP11

first the ini a300/a310, then the toliss a346, now the q4xp, and we got the rotate md-11 in beta and the ff 777v2/787 coming soon!

lovely review! much better than the jar a345

@BernardoCasaare you guys gonna do an update review on 1.6? They added a new cockpit

it does not seem the best...

ini A300 is a much better option

i understand it is still in development but it is far behind compared to other products of the same strategy (magknight 787)

FF767 or 757?

17 hours ago, Stephen said:

 

Better yes with SID/STAR, but better no as there are still a many too areas on the aircraft which are dated...  but at least you can now fly the aircraft in services and long haul routes...

imo its already much better than the 777.

its finally here!

how big is the file size?

I installed the demo version and it took 20 GB...

Great review! I might pick this one up for an ultralight.

22 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Let us get this absolutely straight!...   all my reviews are not so called "Official", they are unbiased but are aimed at two major directives, One that I present my position in the position of the purchaser not the store or the developer...  Two comments are directed at the developer in fixing and refining products to meet the price and quality expectation of the purchase. I certainly don't think I was bias on the SAAB 340, in fact there are many areas I criticised the aircraft in what was not up to standard... menus, throttle speeds etc, but in the main aspect this was an excellent product that I fly regularly and I do revisit my initial thoughts on what I liked and didn't like...  I personally think your assessment is wrong, and being a Carenado customer you should know what to expect, I have been personally disappointed by current Carenado products as they are feeling more and more older, but also having more issues that is not living up to the Carenado standard, that said the F27 and SAAB 340 is not part of those aircraft, as value they are some of the best Carenado have produced...  Stephen Dutton, X-PlaneReviews

Ah, alright then

they are great and helpful reviews either way  

keep it up!

On 6/23/2020 at 12:14 AM, Moonfoam said:

Speaking as a longtime fan and loyal Carenado customer (easily $1K lifetime purchases), this is without question one of the worst products Carenado has ever released. There are enormous system simulation errors in this model (CTOT, entire autopilot interface, aerodynamic holes in the plane modeling), and the cockpit textures are, to be generous, perhaps up to X-Plane 9 standards.

 

It's disappointing when a review misses the mark this badly. We would all benefit from more honest, thorough product reviews.

while  its  true that some reviews are a bit bias to the developer, we have to notice that these reviews are actually the 'official' reviews that go up in the store page.

and  badmouthing a product in the 'reviews' section of a product isnt the best idea. 

nevertheless, Stephen still does point out some cons  of the aircrafts. though mostly he points out the advantages though

a note on the 777 ground  services is that there  are emergency slides, which is  really rare.

and  i  find it satisfying, especially  when i do an 'emergency' landing.  

On 10/14/2013 at 5:35 PM, Stephen said:

Only a few weeks back Thomas Cook revealed their new livery, as with the same makeover for their German subsidiary Condor. I loved the clean bright livery and RC Marple went straight to work and has now released both.

 

RIP  thomas cook

this aircraft looks fabulous, how FPS compare to JAR 330 , FF777,  FFA350, or ZIBO 737?

Thank!

On 4/12/2020 at 10:26 AM, Stephen said:

Same aircraft? still in development as per the reviews..

I think VMAX 787 is '787 Dreamliner XP11'.

Also I am interested in this plane. Bernardo Casa said that it's worth getting, so should I get it, or the Peter Hager A321 NEO?

I really want a fuel-efficient, modernized plan.e

which peter a320? A319 CFM/IAE, A320 CFM/IAE/NEO, A321 CFM/IAE/NEO?

Good? Or FF A350 better?

want a long haul modern plane.

SSG E195LR Evo FPS = XCRAFTS E170 FPS?

i have e170 and want a e190/-195. Have XCRAFTS e170 so interested in spereate option: SSG.

FPS similar/same? @BernardoCasa says XCRAFTS ERJ 145 FPS is same as ssg e195, but is true for xcrafts e170 and ssg e195?

thank.

Hi Stephen what is the best regional jet? JRollon CRJ, xcrafts erj, xcrafts ejet, or ssg ejet?

thank.

1 hour ago, Stephen said:

 

Both are getting quite old now, certainly the CRJ200, but I loved the CRJ200 with the BSS Sound pack, it brought new life back into the machine.

Thank you. But for regional flying, this the best?

Crj200 any good?

1 hour ago, Stephen said:

Confused? JARDesign don't have a B767, that is FlightFactor...  or is it the A330?

I mean how FPS on 767 compares to zibo and jar330. Sorry.

Thank uou

Hallo Stephen. I say before I want JARDESIGN A330-200, but then I see this B767-300ER. They have similar range so I am wonder, how is FPS compared to zibo and jar A330 (JARDesign Gave me temporary serial to test fps) on 767? 

Thank you 😊